User:Mandolynrain/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Andy Schor

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose to evaluate this article because he is the mayor of city next to the one I currently reside in. It matters because he is a political figure and it is important to know who is representing you and your city. My preliminary impression of this specific article is disappointment as he is a strong figure of a populated city and his biography should have more information, especially for individuals looking to vote for a representative and mayor for their local city.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

There is a lot of content missing in this article, it is unbalanced as there is one sentence about his education and early life and paragraphs about his career. Since he is a political figure his views and political opinions should be shared and represented here. There are minimal sources at the end of the page that appear to be reliable and provide valuable information. There are many aspects in his biography that are left out and could be valuable points of information, like statistical details, for individuals searching for basic information about their representative. The article provides media like an image of Andy Schor and a single table representing other individuals who held office. The article is neutral as it discusses very basic information about the Andy Schor. Finally, the lead sentence encompasses the information that is shared in the overall page very well, I think it is a good lead section.