User:Mandymelville/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title : User Experience Design :
 * Article Evaluation : The article has a total of 406 average daily views. It was ranked within the class of C, so it is moderately developed, but there is definitely room for improvement! Most of the claims made in the article are not directly cited with specific sources. There is a general reference to "sources" at the beginning of the article, but it doesn't provide specific citations for the information. For example, when discussing the history of UX design, and the role of Donald Norman, there is no direct citation to a source. Similarly, the article mentions the need for citations and references, but does not provide any for certain claims. It mentions "news, newspapers, books, and scholars" as resources, without providing specifics. :
 * Sources:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marc-Hassenzahl/publication/259823352_User_Experience_and_Experience_Design/links/56a7352d08ae997e22bbc807/User-Experience-and-Experience-Design.pdf:

Option 2

 * Article title : User Interface Design :
 * Article Evaluation : The article has a total of 316 average daily views. Its ranking was B, so it is a moderately developed article. Therefore, there is room for improvement. The reliability of the citations varies. Some of the citations, such as references to ISO standards and established experts like Don Norman, are likely to be reliable sources. However, some references are from online sources that may need further evaluation. The article primarily focuses on the technical aspects of UI design, and does not appear to directly address equity gaps. :
 * Sources:https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-87115-3_1

Option 3

 * Article title : Technical Communication :
 * Article Evaluation : The article has a total of 103 average daily views. This article was also ranked within Class C, so improvements can be made! The article includes several claims and statements related to technical communication, its definition, and its practices. However, not all claims have specific citations to external sources. For example, some statements regarding the roles and responsibilities of technical communicators could benefit from citations to support the information written. :
 * Sources:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15427625tcq0603_2

Option 4

 * Article title : Technical Writing :
 * Article Evaluation : The article has a total of 206 daily views. This article was within the Class S, so it is only within its beginning stages. It present facts about technical writing, without taking a biased or opinionated approach. The language is clear and concise. However, more sources can be added. In general, only some of the claims within the article contain in-text citations to back the facts. :
 * Sources:https://www.kau.edu.sa/files/830/subjects/13151_tw-1.pdf

Option 5

 * Article title : Medical Writing :
 * Article Evaluation : The article has a total of 37 average daily view. This particular article is ranked within a Class S. Therefore, it was only in the beginning stages of development. However, this also leaves a lot of room for improvement. This is likely due to the lack of knowledge about medical writing, and the daily view value supports this theory, as well. Some of the citations provided by the article appear to be reliable resources, such as references to established professional organizations like the American Medical Association (AMWA). However, there are also citations to sources that may not be as easily accessible or widely recognized, which could affect the article's overall reliablity. :
 * Sources
 * https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/abs/10.1148/radiol.223312?journalCode=radiology