User:Mandymelville/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

User experience

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it is relevant to topics we discuss for my class. It matters because it educates people on what UX is, how it originated, and its relevancy. Overall, I see the article as a sweeping overview of UX, providing a few definitions, a history, and what it means to users.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section : The article has a great lead section. Before diving into the subsections, a brief overview of the topic at hand is provided. Furthermore, with the paragraph being only six lines, it allows readers to garner a quick understanding. However, there are a lot of links to other articles within this lead, which can be beneficial, but also distracting.

Content : The article's content is all relevant to the topic at hand. Each paragraph follows a shorter format that keeps the delivery of information concise and clear. If names are mentioned, they are linked. Furthermore, if other relevant topics are mentioned, they are also linked to other Wikipedia articles.

Tone and Balance : The article maintains a neutral tone, which is essential to Wikipedia articles. At no point does it appear to be pushing an particular biases. It remains strictly informative throughout.

Sources and References : The sources contain numerous articles on a diverse array of UX topics. The references also branch into topics such as HCI and User-Centered Design. It allows viewers to garner numerous perspectives on the topic.