User:Mandymelville/User experience design/Logan Picunko Peer Review

General info
MandyMelville
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):User experience design

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

I think that the lead for the article could be improved through some rewording, however I don't think it requires any new information in order to be improved at the moment.

Content:

I think you have found some good information to add to the article, however, I think you still need to find a second place to add/edit information in order to utilize your second source. I know you cited your first source a couple times in the technical communicators section, however, I would look into adding some more information to helpd round out some sections of the article.

Tone and Balance:

You maintain the tone and balance of the article overall.

Sources and References:

Seems like you have reliable sources.

Organization:

Good organization. Nothing you have added has ditracted from the flow or intent of the article as a whole.

Overall impressions:

Pretty solid edits that expands the scope of the original article.