User:Mangosaur/Evaluate an Article


 * Name of article: Rhodopsin Kinase
 * The eye is a small, yet complex and intriguing part of our bodies. Rhodopsin kinase plays a role in vision, and it's something I'm interested in knowing more about.

Lead evaluation
The Lead is concise and straight to the point. It also contains brief details that is not present in the rest of the article.

Content evaluation
The Lead introduced a topic briefly that wasn't mentioned in the content itself. There are cited sources that date back to the 1970's and 80's.

Tone and balance evaluation
The article is neutral as there are no biases.


 * Sources and references evaluation

The links of the sources work, and the reflect the article topic. Some date back to the 1970's.

Organization evaluation
There are no grammatical or spelling errors, but the article is a bit hard to read. Some sentences are long and contain vocabulary that an audience reading about this topic for the first time may not understand. Some information can be expanded.

Images and media evaluation
There are no images or media.

Talk page evaluation
The way Wikipedia discusses this topic is definitely a lot more dense, and contains a lot of information that was not mentioned in class.

Overall evaluation
The article definitely has interesting points and good information, but they can be expanded and put into simpler terms.