User:Maniwar/response to john

Your comments
Johh, or whatever your name is, I want to discuss some things with you regarding your comment here. Let's take this point by point. add here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:136.242.180.140&action=edit&section=1
 * 1) Let's define bigot - One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ. Many people misuse this word often and don't know what it actually means. I'm not disputing your charge that Amazing Facts said what what you are proposing, nor am I disputing that you feel they are anti-catholics. However, they are not bigoted. For you to make such a statement, you would have to show proof that they are truly intolerant of Catholics. You would have to support that with sources. I highly doubt you can produce and evidence. Therefore I am suggesting that you are misusing that word. On another point, let's be realistic. If I see a dog, and from my perspective, I state that that is a bad dog. Following your statement, I am not entitled to that opinion. I have just expressed and opinion, which is my free constitutional right. However, according to you, I don't have that right and I am not, though wrongly used, a bigot for calling the dog bad.