User:Manna43/Arthrobacter luteus/ECD DeVries Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Manna43


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Manna43/Arthrobacter luteus
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Arthrobacter luteus

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The article does show a neutral position to the information given, stating facts that have been proved by numerous people. The link to the sources works well allowing people attempting to find further information to easily access the article that the information was found. The source is also up to date with the article cited being released this year, 2022. Everything in the article is used properly and supported by fact that can easily be checked. The one thing that I have a hard tie with is the terms that were used. The passage is highly geared towards people who have a very great understanding of microbiology and because I am not one of those people, it is very hard for me to understand what is truly being said. In adding this information, the article will be more complete in that it will fill holes that are currently present in the article. In all, the passage is very well written but I would consider using a little different language so that it is more easily understandable.