User:Manny.Rod1029/Chiquihuitlán Mazatec/Opdcanlb7 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Manny.Rod1029


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Manny.Rod1029/Chiquihuitlán Mazatec


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Chiquihuitlán Mazatec

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The Lead has not been updated from the original lead on the original article. More information was added to the "background" section, which might be the "new" lead but is under the wrong section. The "lead" does have an introductory sentence that briefly explains what Chiquihuitlán Mazatec is. The lead includes information that is not present in the article, but only because the article isn't complete. The lead is also concise but some sentences could be merged together so there's not some type of repetitiveness or choppiness. The content added is relevant and up-to-date and has no information that does not belong. This article does not deal with any topics related to underrepresented populations or topics. The content added is neutral and is not biased toward a particular side/viewpoint. All links to references work and the content added is backed up by secondary sources like journals. However, the references were not put in alphabetical order like a bibliography should be. The content is clear but like mentioned earlier, some sentences could be merged to make the paragraph flow better. The lead also doesn't mention the "language revitalization" section that is already part of the article. The article does not include any pictures. The article is obviously not complete yet, but is a good start to the rest of the article. The lead has nice information that could lead to different sections that explain everything in more depth (for example, a section could talk more about the history of the name or another section could be about the language's shorter syllable structure mentioned in the lead).