User:Manorhe18/Harm reduction/Daniellesori Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Manorhe18


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Manorhe18/Harm_reduction?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Harm reduction

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hi Rhea, here's my peer review:

Lead


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - Unsure if there is a lead section, however all of the additions seem to be straight forward.

Content


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? - Your additions have new citations to the existing information on the article.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? - Yes, articles seem to be retrieved up-to-date.

Tone and Balance


 * Is the content added neutral? - Yes
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? - No, added content provides additional information in sections.

Source and References


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - Not much citations were added. In your additions for sections "Descriminalisation" and "Harm Reduction in Mainstream US Healthcare" there are no citations included. Might help to provide some!

Organization


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? - Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? - For your new section "Harm Reduction in Mainstream US Healthcare" it might be beneficial to capitalize it as "Harm reduction in mainstream US healthcare," as I have noticed this in Wikipedia articles.

Overall Impressions


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? - Yes! Overall, would be more complete with citations in your sections.

Warmly,

Danielle