User:Manson B/Forensic science/Bsimprr Peer Review

General info
(Manson b)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
The content added is very much relevant to the topic he is discussing. His content is up to date in every aspect but he is missing content about detailed descriptions of the forensic techniques, methodologies, and procedures used in the investigation are essentials for transparency and replicability. If these are missing, readers may struggle to understand the reliability and validity of the findings. Make forensic science articles and associated data openly accessible to the scientific community and the public whenever possible. Open access and data sharing promote transparency, collaboration, and reproducibility of research. Submit forensic science articles to reputable peer-reviewed journals for rigorous evaluation by experts in the field. Peer review ensures the quality, validity, and reliability of the research findings. By implementing these strategies, forensic science articles can be enhanced in terms of transparency, rigor, validity, and relevance, thereby contributing to the advancement of the field and its application in the criminal justice system.

·