User:MarAJade501/Australiteuthis/Asloot88 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

MarAJade501 and Kylezo13


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Australiteuthis&type=revision&diff=1016437005&oldid=1016184019
 * Typed edits here: User:MarAJade501/sandbox


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

- I think all of the information you've included is relevant and important, but you could include some more about the other sections you've added (characteristics, distribution, habitat, and biology).

Content:

- The content all seems relevant and up-to-date.

Tone and Balance:

- The whole article seems neutral, based in fact, and doesn't seem like it's trying to persuade the readers of anything.

Sources and References:

- The sources you've included seem reliable (from trustworthy databases, books, and scientific journals).

- Some of your sentences in Geographical Distribution, Habitat, and Biology are missing sources, and Characteristics doesn't have a source.

- The links worked when I clicked on them.

Organization:

- The content is concise and easy to read.

- I like the organization of the Characteristics section because it's easy to understand their defining characteristics and what separates them from other organisms.

- There are some spelling errors (decoapodiformes -> decapodiformes; commanly -> commonly; some more too) and some capitalization errors. I would just quick scan through and make sure all of the first words in sentences are capitalized and that you don't have random capitalizations in the middle of sentences unless they're supposed to be there. I'm also pretty sure that any of the scientific names for genus, family, order, etc. should be italicized.

- For organization, you could probably combine Biology with Characteristics since they're talking about similar subjects. You could also combine Geographical Distribution and Habitat so that your sections would be similar lengths, but I think these are fine separate too because there are distinctions between the two.

Images and Media:

- Since no live specimens have been found, I'm not sure how many images are available for use, but you could put in another image of the squid somewhere in the article or maybe a diagram of the characteristics you described.

Overall Impressions:

- Overall, the content seems really relevant and backed up by reliable sources. I would just say try to fix the spelling/grammatical errors to make it easier to understand.