User:Maradeleonm/Ecuadorian Siona/Isand4 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ecuadorian Siona


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Maradeleonm/Ecuadorian Siona - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ecuadorian Siona - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
It is clear that this article is moving in the right direction. I hope this review can be helpful. I look forward to seeing the development of the article.


 * I am impressed by the depth and breadth of information included in this article. From reading the section on morphology, it is clear to me that the sources have been put to good use.
 * I noticed that several of the sources being cited throughout the article have been published recently. This is great as it helps ensure that the information included in the article is updated with the newest information regarding this topic.
 * In addition, the content of the article seems to remain as objective and neutral as it can be. Given the limited quantity of information available on this topic and with the language having so few speakers, it can be difficult to find information that can address topics related to this language and its population. In my own work, I am working towards incorporating as many recent sources as I can.
 * This article implements charts in a laudable manner. In my personal experience, I find charts/graphs communicate information clearly and efficiently. This is something I am looking to implement in the article my group is working on.
 * I would suggest moving some of the information present in the lead to its own section, particularly the information regarding the relationship between Ecuadorian Siona and its relation to other languages.
 * It would also be prudent to continue to proofread the article for spelling/grammar mistakes and cite as much of the article using relevant, up-to-date sources.
 * Though I think it is interesting, I think it would help to revise the section on the status of preaspiration to make it more accessible to the average reader.
 * In a similar vein, I think adding relevant images/media throughout the entirety of the article will not only help the average reader better understand the article but will help develop the aesthetic character of the article.