User:MarcelaCurcio/Marrus orthocanna/Realefu Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

MarcelaCurcio/Marrus orthocanna


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:MarcelaCurcio/Marrus orthocanna
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Marrus orthocanna

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

'''The additions are concise and includes information about the organism's family and order. The content is detailed and neutral, and the research is up to date. All the information is backed up by reliable sources, which have working links in the references. In this history section, the word "discovered" is used very repetitively, perhaps use a synonym so it is not repeated as often would make this section better. Overall the article is well written and has proper grammar and spelling. The tone of the article is neutral and is not heavily biased towards any particular position. The references 6 and 7 are the exact same, so I would suggest removing one.'''