User:MarcelaOrdonez/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) Women migrant workers from developing countries
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I wanted to know more about women in the workforce.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? no.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? no.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? yes.
 * Is the content up-to-date? yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? yes.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? yes it pertains to what is mostly an underrepresented population.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no mostly facts.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no its educational.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? no not all backed up.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes.
 * Are the sources current? yes.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? diverse authors.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes very clear.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? no.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? yes.
 * Are images well-captioned? yes but could be more detailed.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? yes.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? yes.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Most would agree that is this an interesting topic.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? This article is not rated nor a wiki project.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? We havent talked about in class.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? reliable but still needs work.
 * What are the article's strengths? The strengths of this article that it illustrates a topic not much talked about.
 * How can the article be improved? This article could be improved by providing resources that back up the facts.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? This article is well developed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: