User:Marchjuly/sandbox

Soundtrack album covers
Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE and MOS:TVPRODUCTION.

Category:Album covers

Former logos
Non-free former logo being used in a WP:DECORATIVE manner in a gallery of former logos in : which fails WP:NFCC and WP:NFG. Non-free former logos can be used as long as their use complies with WP:NFC and this almost always means the logo itself about the logo and the associated change in brandling that led to its replacement is the subject of sourced critical commentary. Simply adding the logo to "show" what it looks like is not considered sufficient to satisfy WP:NFC, except in cases where the logo is being used for primary identification purposes at the top of or in the main infobox of an article about the organization the logo represents.

Rfu
Non-free image of living person being used for primary identification purposes in the main infobox of : which fails WP:NFCC. Non-free images of living people are pretty much never allowed per WP:FREER and item 1 of WP:NFC because its almost always considered reasonable to expect that a free equivalent image can either be found or created to serve the same encyclopedic purpose as any non-free one

Hi. Just to clarify the above, Wikipedia's non-free content use policy pretty much never allows non-free images of living people to be uploaded and added to articles (except under certain limited conditions) because it's almost always considered reasonable for a free equivalent image to either be newly taken or otherwise created and then licensed under one of the free copyright licenses that Wikipedia accepts; furthermore, the default is never to use a non-free image simply until such a free equivalent image can be found. While it's true that the other photos in (...) do show (...), there doesn't seem to be any reasonable reason that's stopping anyone from taking a more recent photo of (...) and uploading that photo to Wikipedia for use in the article under an acceptable free license. For that reason alone, any non-free image of (...) is pretty much never going to be allowed simply just to show (...). Now, if you disagree with this assessment, follow the instructions given in point 1 above and explain why. A Wikipedia administrator will review whatever your reasons are for contesting the file's speedy deletion and decide what to do (i.e. whether the file meets the requirements for speedy deletion or is something that should be further discussed at WP:FFD). - ~

Non-free image being used in : which fails WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC. Since the public domain image : being used in the main infobox of the article about XXXX is more than sufficient for primary identification purposes, a non-free one isn't necessary for that reason per WP:FREER. Moreover, the image itself isn't the subject of any sourced critical commentary and just seems to be WP:DECORATIVE non-free use showing a scene from one of the many films and TV programs that XXXX appeared in during XXX career; so, there's really no strong contextual justification for the image's non-free use per WP:NFC

Non-free image of deceased person which fails both WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC. The public domain image : is being used in the main infobox for primary identification purposes; so, a non-free image is not needed for that reason per WP:FREER. Moreover, this particular screenshot isn't itself the subject of any source critical commentary : and it just shows her in one of a number of roles she played on TV during their career. The brief paragraph about their appearances on the " " don't require seeing this non-free screenshot to be understood by the reader; so, there's really no strong contextual justification for the non-free use of this file per WP:NFC

Non-free image of deceased person being used in the main infobox of : which fails both WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC. The freely/public domain licensed image : also being used in the article can serve the same purpose as the non-free one in the main infobox; so, a non-free image is no longer needed for that reason per WP:FREER. Moreover, this particular image isn't itself the subject of any source critical commentary in the article and the reader doesn't need to see it to understand anything written about XXXX in the article; so, there's really no strong contextual justification for the non-free use of this file per WP:NFC

Images in headings

 * insource:image insource:/== *\[\[(file|image):/i
 * insource:/== *\{\{flag/
 * insource:/== *\{\{[^\}]+[^=]+/

Citations in headings

 * insource:/== *\<\ref/

Former logo galleries

 * insource:/== *\Previous logo/

KPRF