User:Marcou320/PCO2/Tiffanylujan Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Marcou320


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Marcou320/PCO2


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * PCO2

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Great contribution of new information to the article! This has a neutral tone with two minimum source requirements for Wikipedia, but it is likely more sources are available to add to the article.

Don't forget to add the sources to the bibliography!
 * In the first paragraph my suggestion with formatting is to omit the "as stated above" or other references to what other authors have written on the page. Terms such as "but also even" found in the first paragraph should be avoided and instead end the sentence.
 * The second paragraph contains a lot of information that may need to be further explained to lay people. Such as a in depth description of a sink or the link to the Wikipedia article that can give background. It may be easier to read if the modification examples were initially given then in a later sentence state how that would effect the PCO2.
 * The content added can be improved by discussing how PCO2 is measured in streams and lakes.