User:Mardavich/Evidence

This is a draft of my evidence, which will be submitted shortly.

Applicable policies and guidelines

 * WP:NPA
 * WP:Civil
 * WP:3RR
 * WP:GAME
 * WP:AGF
 * WP:NPOV

Summery of WP:NPA and WP:Civil
No personal attacks states: Comment on content, not on the contributor. It's further explained that "Using someone's affiliations as a means of dismissing or discrediting their views" is prohibited. The policy concludes that "Users who insist on a confrontational style marked by personal attacks are likely to be handled through the dispute resolution process, possibly including the serious consequences of arbitration, and may become subject to a community ban". Civility is defined as "personally targeted behavior that causes an atmosphere of greater conflict and stress'' with "Rudeness" and "Judgmental tone in edit summaries" given as valid examples.

Miskin regularly violates WP:NPA and WP:Civil

 * "Arvand your edit-summary has no basis...You know that you're POV-pushing, so it will only be a waste of our time."
 * "Someone would think that you take pleasure in victimising yourself."
 * "At least I know how to sign my name."
 * " What can I say, this is for laughs."
 * "You're not being neutral Jagged and I'm sorry."
 * "Fair enough, I'll play along....This dispute will put the many things about disruptive nationalist editors to the test."
 * "I have nothing to discuss anymore. You're not blatantly interested in making contributions, you're only interested in passing partisan POV. "
 * "...I smelled a rat behind the pro-Iranica coalition"
 * "Don't make me laugh....the editors who are causing the edit wars and violate NPOV are a coalition of Iranian and/or Indian partisan users who communicate by email in order to push their POV in several different articles. "
 * "The article has been worse than an Iranian school book for months, and you suddenly care about how many scholars choose Diodorus over Arrian? I mean come on, show some respect."
 * "And as always, yourself, Mardavich et al are the only ones having difficulties to understand what seems to be obvious to other editors"
 * More evidence will be posted by Friday the June 8th.

Summery of WP:3RR and WP:GAME
Three-revert rule states: "The rule does not convey an entitlement to revert three times each day, nor does it endorse reverting as an editing technique" further explaining that "This particularly applies to editors who persistently make three reverts each day, or three reverts on each of a group of pages, in an apparent effort to game the system"

Other

 * "The article has been worse than an Iranian school book for months, and you suddenly care about how many scholars choose Diodorus over Arrian? I mean come on, show some respect."
 * "I replaced Irannica's laughable estimates with the numbers that appear to be the western consensus, and in my opinion, the real side of the story."
 * "Do you expect anyone to believe that this was written by a western author?"