User:Margaretbhanna/Environmental impact of fishing/Atharvawadodkar Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Margaretbhanna)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Margaretbhanna/Environmental impact of fishing


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Environmental impact of fishing

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

My peer has not updated the lead. It is well-written and covers relevant information about the article and included an introductory statement describing the article. The lead shows statistics that explain the important impacts of overfishing by humans. It provided good introductory knowledge of how overfishing would effect the future.

Content

The content added is relevant to the article and is up-to-date. I love how my peer expanded on the topic of fisheries management and provided further explanation on Individual Transferable Quotas (ITQ's). This provided good background in how much fish the fisheries are allowed to catch. It provides proper statistic information and the merits and demerits of the ITQ's. The content written is about fisheries management but I am confused whether it is additional information added to the sub-topic of fisheries management and fish farming or a whole new section on its own.

Tone and Balance

The tone of the content added was neutral and unbiased. I enjoyed reading the additional information.

Sources and references

The sources added are from trustworthy scientific papers and every paragraph has been cited appropriately.

Images and media

There were no images added.