User:Margaritamanrique7/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) Absolute pitch
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I chose this article because it interests me and it is not controversial

Lead

 * Guiding questions

Yes the Lead does include an concise and clear introductory topic sentence. No the lead to does include a brief description of the articles major sections. yes the lead does include information that is not present in the article. The lead is a little bit too overdetailed.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

 * Guiding questions

yes the content is relevant to the topic. And yes the content is up to date many sources are from the 1900s but the latest one is from 2019. No there is no content missing or content that does not belong.


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions
 * The article is neutral. No there are no claims that seem heavily bias except a part that says there is no evidence for it. yes the view point of history and musical influence. No the article does not attempt to persuade the reader.


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions

Yes all of the facts are backed up by articles. yes the sources are thorough there are many. Not all sources are current, many are from the 1900s or 1800s. One of the links that I checked does not work.


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

 * Guiding questions

yes is well written. The article has some grammatical errors. yes the article is very well organized except the Lead is a little hard to understand


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions

No the article does not have images.


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions

There is no one really talking about this article. The class is rated B class. It is wikiprojects.


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions

The articles overall status is good. The strengths are it is well organized and clear. The article can improve by having more up to date sources and having more information. Yes the article is well developed.


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: