User:Margo.C.45/Ernesta Bordoni/Jeorgiaobrien Peer Review

General info
Margo.C.45
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Editing User:Margo.C.45/Ernesta Bordoni - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):N/a

Evaluate the drafted changes
Bibliography:

The sources for your bibliography look great. From what I can see, they seem reputable. I would consider adding access dates and reviewing your MLA format for any online articles.

Sandbox Draft:

The lead of your article seems consistent to what the article is about. I think adding links to different definitions within this section is helpful for readers. I also liked that you specified how she has been reanalyzed in history. This helps readers understand text about her that may violate the neutrality requirement.

Within the early life section of the text, I was a little confused as to if she was a prostitute or if it was just speculation. At first it seems like an unclear claim but later it says she operated independently. Is it known whether she was a prostitute or not?

The section related to the murder of her husband is very interesting. It definitely shows the treatment of women during this time period and how their candor was not considered reputable. I think adding in similar cases to Bordoni's may make her actions more understandable and also frame the time period she was living in as woman to readers.

The final section of your reading is unique because many of us don't have historic research about our assigned person. I would frame this study within the time period it was being conducted so readers do not think it is current knowledge. I think you could also elaborate on how many men and pseudo scientists used these claims against woman throughout history.