User:Marher2/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Sibon irmelindicaprioae)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(I chose this article because it does not have enough information or is not a well known topic and can be expanded. This topic matters because it is a newly discovered species. This article has a brief description of what the species is but does not have enough information or pictures.)

Evaluate the article
(The leading section includes an introductory and concise sentence that describes the topic.There is no description of any major sections because there are no sections in the article. The lead is concise but could be simplified. The articles content is related to the topic. The current content seems to be up to date but is missing some information. The articles tone is neutral to begin with but then it goes on to talk about helping the species not be endangered. The author seems to want to persuade the reader to help protect these species. Not all facts in the article are backed up. The links seem to work but there are better sources available as the sources cited are mainly just websites. The content is not organized and is just split into two paragraphs. There is only one image available. There isn't much of a talk page discussion. This article can be expanded by including better sources. The article can also use more wikipedia links that are not connected.)