User:MariaTSH/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Atlixco
 * Article Evaluation
 * - This is article has a neutral standing and talks about a variety of topics from the geography of Atlixco, the history of Atlixco, and the culture of that place.
 * - It is organized in a good way where everything is easy to look at and have a good understanding of.
 * - The paragraphs are also separated so that it's not all clumped up and it's easier to read.
 * - There are some parts that it lightly touches on that can be further talked about.
 * - Each claim does have a citation
 * Sources
 * - It has many sources cited that can be accessed and that still work.
 * Sources
 * - It has many sources cited that can be accessed and that still work.

Option 2

 * Cabrera
 * Article Evaluation
 * - There is no article on this topic
 * - I want to create and article towards this topic because it is a part of Atlixco that is really big and has a majority of flowers growing their.
 * - Some topics that can be put in would be like why there are many flowers in that part of Atlixco, what are the type of flowers, culture of that place.
 * Sources
 * - As far as I have searched I do not see sources that can back up what I want to talk about.
 * - I don't know if I could use outside sources from google and use that as a source where I can get my information from.
 * - Pictures I have some picture because I went there during the summer.
 * - Pictures I have some picture because I went there during the summer.

Option 3

 * Kookierhondje
 * Article Evaluation
 * - It is a neutral article, does not sway the reader to like or dislike this type of dog breed.
 * - Topics are separated in ways where it is easy to go to a topic and read the information that is under it.
 * - There are also good pictures that someone is able to look at to get a good idea of what this type of breed of dog looks like.
 * - It also gives the history of where these dogs came from and what they were used for. It also lists the type of diseases that these dogs can get.
 * Sources
 * - They have sources cited on their page but their are still some topics where it does not have enough sources.
 * - More sources can be included in the article. They need to be sources that be reliable and won't get taken down by the Wikipedia people.
 * - More sources can be included in the article. They need to be sources that be reliable and won't get taken down by the Wikipedia people.

Option 4

 * Chapulines (Grasshoppers)
 * Article Evaluation
 * - This article has neutral tone, talks about what chapulines are and where they are eaten as well as how they are prepared and made.
 * - It also gives how there are health risks to eating them because they can have a high level of lead contamination which can be because they were processed in bowls.
 * Sources
 * - They have sources in each of their topics
 * - All the links are accessible and look like they can be reliable.
 * - There's pictures for reference on how they look when they are fried or cooked and how they look when they are paired up with food.
 * - There's pictures for reference on how they look when they are fried or cooked and how they look when they are paired up with food.

Option 5

 * Tinga (dish)
 * Article Evaluation
 * - The article sounds neutral
 * - Their is not much on the article except the ingredients it contains and the origin of the dish.
 * - There can be more that can written about. The ingredients can be changed because that is not all that the dish includes.
 * - It also says the page is stub and that it needs help in expanding it.
 * Sources
 * - This article does not have sources for every topic
 * - There can be more that be sourced
 * - I don't know if outside resources can be cited like from google instead of Wikipedia
 * - I don't know if outside resources can be cited like from google instead of Wikipedia