User:Mariafolio/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Feminist rhetoric

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I am in the college of communications so I went with communication studies and found the feminist rhetoric because of my interest in it.

Evaluate the article
Good lead section with clear introduction with plenty of citations. The entire article is not written from one point of view and covers a wide range of topic in an organized way throughout the article and stays away from overly positive/negative connotations. There are several missing links and "citations needed" that I would change because it may seem like the article is unreliable if citations are still needed. It also might be deemed as unreliable because though the sources all seem reliable, the most updated one is back in the early 2010's.

It does not include any media, but I honestly do not think it would add anything that the article is missing. On the talk page, I saw the article was last edited in January 2022, which is great and reliable that it is being kept up-to-date. There are no discussions going on in the talk page, but honestly, I feel the article is well-organized enough to be a well-reliable article despite its few missing citations.