User:Mariafolio/G-Dropping/Djsi2135 Peer Review

- Lead has been updated.

-Lead includes introduction.

-Lead does include brief description.

- Lead does include information not in the articles main sections mainly brief neccesary information.

- The lead is concise and not overly detailed.

Content

-Content is relative to the topic including history linguistic phenomenon, Modern usage and pop culture.

-Content is up to date.

- No missing content or misplaced content.

-Does mention equity gaps.

Tone and balance

- Content is neutral

- No obvious bias.

- Neutral viewpoint.

- Neutral persuasion within article.

Sources and references

- Neutral sources.

- Content accurately depicts that citation

- Sources do reflect topic.

- Sources are current.

- Diverse sources.

- Sources are good.

- Source links work.

Organization

- Content added is well written and concise.

- I fixed a couple minor grammatical errors but other than that good grammar and puncuation.

- Content is well organized.

Overall

-Content added to the article makes the article stronger the article feels more complete. it will be even better when the pop culture section is added.

- The history section adds to the strength of the article by providing accurate details of how the linguistic phenomenon first occurred.

I think if you guys add a little more to the linguistic phenomenon it would make the article awesome.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(djsi2135)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mariafolio/G-Dropping?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)