User:Marialobatograbowsky/United Nations Operation in Mozambique/Potatofeets Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Marialobatograbowsky


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Marialobatograbowsky/United_Nations_Operation_in_Mozambique?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * United Nations Operation in Mozambique

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

- The Lead was not updated but it does still reflect what the rest of the content will be describing

- The lead does have a concise introductory sentence and includes somewhat of an outline of the rest of the article

- The lead is not overly detailed, it is a brief little introduction of what exactly the topic is about

Content

- The content added is relevant to the rest of the topic and has been very well described throughout the page

- The content is up to date and includes further details meaning there is nothing that is missing or out of place

- The article seems to include everything from the past to the present and does not shy away from including content that brings awareness to situations and changes occurring

Tone and Balance

- Content added is very much neutral

- The article does not fall under the term one sided but rather expands on claims that are only facts

- there is no misrepresentations and includes everything and everyone

Sources and References

- Content is very much backed up with reliable sources and has the inclusion of information that is extended

- Each source accurately reflects the rest of the article

- The links work and I do not see the need to add additional sources as each claim is backed up with further sourcing

- Trustworthy sources and arent one sided

Organization

- This articke is concise and well written

-The structure is well thought of and the topics seem to follow perfectly

-While my grammar may not be the best, I do see this article has no errors but of course throughout the article there could be a few revisions

Overall:

I believe this article is very high quality and completed! Although there could always be room for improvement such as adding a few images or maps, the content is there and suffices the amount of information needed. This article has many strengths such as the complexity of the outlining, the abudance of information or the sourcing of amazing sources. Each source is up to date and so is the information being added. There is not much I could deduct points from as this article exceeds expectations, I have very minimum criticisms such as added a few pictures.