User:Mariam Shadad/Disaggregated Data/Loraaljbour Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mariam Shadad


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mariam%20Shadad/Disaggregated_Data?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mariam%20Shadad/Disaggregated_Data/Loraaljbour_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Feedback:


 * The lead statement is great!
 * Maybe expand on statements listed under ’Theories and connections’, maybe even place in a table, could be more accessible this way.
 * I apprecaite the clarity on the distinction between aggregate and disaggregate data. Maybe you could expand on implications of disaggregated data, this will add a more valuable discussion to the article but also give more balance on other areas related to disaggregate data. - never mind, I see that you are in the process of that!
 * Consider mentioning any applicable examples that will add value to the article.
 * I like that the viewpoints stated are neutral, and I think revolving this topic around CDS is good too!
 * Theories 1-5 are not cited, I am sure you have that noted :)
 * The references section also adds to the balanced feel of the article as there are many sources. Great job gathering sources! One comment though, consider sources 7, 9-11. I cannot access the links for some reason but they do not sound very scholarly. Refer to sources section on wikipedia, will give you great insight on what is considered a good cite :)