User:Mariavaron14/Depression in childhood and adolescence/Morganautumn07 Peer Review

General info
Mariavaron14
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Mariavaron14/Depression in childhood and adolescence
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Depression in childhood and adolescence

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - The lead is well written and covers the new content as they are only updating the data within the topic not adding a new topic.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? - Yes, the content stays on within the content of the article, however the data is for those ages 12-17, is there any data on younger children because the article is covering children and adolescents.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? - The added content is data from 2021 as they are trying to update the information from 2016, I was wondering if there is even more relevant data to 2023/2024, so this article stays up to date for a longer period of time.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? - Yes the content being added is data/facts found from reliable articles which are being cited within in the article. This includes a government website.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?- The article body written has good statistics however is focused on race and sex, finding more inclusive data may also be helpful.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - Yes there are two references from reliable sources including a government source.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? - Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? - Yes, overall the writer did a great job at formating there addition to the article keeping it clear and concise with transition words and no spelling errors it made it very easy to read.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? - The article only includes one image currently, I think graphical images with data may be helpful visualization for the readers for some of the topics.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? - Yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? - The content being added is updated information that provides a better idea of the levels of depression in the current children and adolescents.
 * How can the content added be improved? - I think updating the references is a really good choice. However, I do not think deleting the 2016 data is necessary rather than just adding in the 2021 data found. Maybe finding reasons the depression has increased or decrease since 2016 could be helpful.