User:Mariettecg/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louise_Merzeau)
 * C'est un article du portail de bibliothéconomie et sciences de l'information sur une femme

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? oui
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? oui
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? non
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? concise

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? oui
 * Is the content up-to-date? oui
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? non
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? oui, ça parle d'une femme

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? oui
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? non
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? non
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? non

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? oui
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? difficile à dire
 * Are the sources current? oui
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? difficile à dire
 * Check a few links. Do they work? oui

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? il pourrait mériter des paragraphes, un peu mur de texte
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? la biographie contient pas mal d'éléments qui ne sont pas vraiment biographiques. Un peu plus axé sur sa production scientifique

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? oui
 * Are images well-captioned? oui
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? il semble que oui
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? bof

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? ça jase de si la page est assez "wikifiée"
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? fait partie des projets france, wikimedia et sciences de l'info
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths? Plutôt complet, bonne idée de la production de la chercheure
 * How can the article be improved? meilleure organisation
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?plutôt bien développé

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: