User:Marisaq12/Celina Hinojosa/Blackpnk Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Marisaq12


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Celina Hinojosa


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Celina Hinojosa

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I felt like you incorporated all five elements for a good Wikipedia article.


 * A lead section that is easy to understand
 * Your lead section is a concise one sentence. It leads the reader what to expect about the artist.
 * A clear structure
 * You followed both our class outline and Wikipedia's outline for a good Wikipedia article. One thing I think could be updated is using larger bullet points for the art section. They are currently very small.
 * Balanced coverage
 * No aspect felt like it over took the other. Each section tells a good summary for her and her work.
 * Neutral content
 * I did not feel like it was biased for or against her. It was all neutral and professional throughout the article.
 * Reliable sources
 * All your sources were from either .org or .gov websites which hold a lot more credibility than ordinary websites. They are were well known published works. I felt like your sources were very reliable and strong for your artist.