User:Marleec25/Haliclystus auricula/Alyssabaldwin222 Peer Review

General info
Marleec25
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Marleec25/Haliclystus auricula
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Haliclystus auricula

Lead

 * Peer nicely updated introductory sentence to make it more accurate & informative.
 * Lead is nicely concise & doesn't contain information not mentioned in later sections.
 * Could use some sentences briefly introducing article's major sections to give reader more general info.

Content

 * All updated content makes information more accurate, informative, and reliable. Gives details to paragraphs that were previously vague, or adds important timeline information.
 * Content is up-to-date, located in more recent research (2004-2019).

Tone & Balance

 * Content added was neutral. Doesn't lean into any particular bias and addresses controversies with open language.

Sources & References

 * Sources are up-to-date, occurring in more recent years (2004-2019).
 * Links work & represent multiple host sites/authors.
 * Could try to find even more recent research for further information (2019-2023).

Organization

 * Content is well-organized, well-written, and concise.
 * Maybe some sections could be combined for organizational purposes? (-- maybe Name/Taxonomy, or Name/Description?)