User:Marleyjayne3/Gid Tanner/Byrdwr Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Marley Russell (Marleyjayne3)

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing Gid Tanner
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead does a good job of introducing the subject and provides a good insight of what the reader will continue to learn about. The lead is also fairly concise and is not too wordy and difficult to read. Everything seems up to date in the article and the information appears accurate from the lead. I do not have any sense of bias when reading the article, everything seems neutral. There is quite a bit of recording media in the article, that may could be written in a more concise way, possibly. The article looks pretty solid in my opinion and gives a good representation of Gid Tanner.