User:Marmilliones/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Victorian era

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it is the subject of the corresponding wikiedu class i am enrolled in. I find this article to be informing as at covers everything from moral standards to housing and public health data of the era.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The first sentence of the lead section gives clearly denotes what the era signifies. The lead section does a good job of summarizing information from the sections that follow. It is not overly detailed not is it too broad, and it does not mention any information that is not discussed later.

The content in the article is all relevant to the era and covers a wide range of key topics regarding the era.

The tone of the article is balanced and neutral. Information is relayed but there are little to no biases or author presence involved.

All information is backed up with secondary sources from a wide range of literature that concerns the era. The links are all functioning properly.

The article is well-written and well-organized. The topics are relevant and flow well from one to the next.

There are a variety of images used to enhance reader experience and understanding of relayed information. They are laid-out in a sensible fashion.

The talk page is not very busy. It seems there were a few edits made and there are a couple suggestions as well.

The article is over-all a solid one, and unless I get to nitpicking, there is not much I would suggest be changed.