User:Marsrocking!/Polyandry in India/Uhohcam Peer Review

Bibliography:

I think the summary of the sources are really effective, but the use for them and the analysis of the sources are not very present. The use for them continues the summary portion. There isn't any analysis for the sources, such as demonstrating validity or how accurate the information is today. The analysis portion can discuss the expertise of the author and what type of source it is. For some sources such as your 1988 source you could discuss how it is may not be recent, but still relevant. Do any of your sources contradict or support one another? This information could also be included.

Lead:

I think the contributions added doesn't really need to be changed based on the information that was added. I do think based on one source you might be able to add to the short section about "Recent years have seen the rise of fraternal polyandry", only depending on what your sources say. I only recommend this because you had a 2021 source. The source they used for this section was from 2005.

Content:

Your content is up to date, and relevant. It seems the topic was pulled from the list that was under other tribal peoples. After a quick look around Wikipedia there is a Polyandry in Tibet section within Wikipedia that could be either helpful to fact check or find additional sources with your research. Might want to define material conditions.

Tone and Balance: The tone and balance is good. It is factual, concise, and doesn't have a lot of sided tone within.

Sources: You do need one additional source. Links work for 3rd source. the 1st and 2nd works for the number section. Sources come from a variety of authors. One source may be a more historical source, but if these practices have not changed then the source if fine.

Images: no images were added

Overall Impression:

I think this is a good start. I think there is a lot of concentration on this section, and not sure if you plan on adding information on the other sections from "other tribal peoples." It does share a similar structure to the other subheadings. The only information that was changed in the last section was the removal of the tribe you choose to focus on. Is there any other tribes that were not discussed in this section? Is there any changes within these tribes where they switch their practices of polyandry?

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)