User:Marthabalthasar/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Grand Canyon National Park
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I like national parks, and the wikipedia page on the Grand Canyon needed more information.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

 * Guiding questions
 * The content is relevant but the development section needs more added to it. The content seems to be up to date.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions
 * The article seems neutral. It is also not really a controversial topic.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions
 * The sources seem reliable. The links that I tried worked.

Organization

 * Guiding questions
 * I don't see any errors; it is well organized.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions
 * The images are well-captioned and laid out in an appealing way.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions
 * The article is a part of a WikiProject, I found it through the WikiProject on protected areas. The conversations in the talk page are about what should and shouldn't be added, like someone suggested a map should be included.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions
 * I think it is pretty well developed, but I think more could go into it, especially under development and activities.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: