User:Martijn Hoekstra/EVPrep

Effectiveness on TfD
In 2014, Andy listed x templates for discussion. Of those, I've selected a random sample of 100 nominations for analyses.
 * --win%-- of the cases the outcome of the discussion was exactly in line with the nomination
 * --lose%-- of the cases the outcome was directly contrary to the nomination
 * --arguable%-- of the cases, the outcome was neither directly in line with Andys recommendation, nor fully opposed to it.

For the last group, initiating a discussion, and coming to an actionable outcome could, and should in my opinion, be seen as a positive result to the encyclopedia, but for the benefit of bright lines I have listed them in a separate group, together with no consensus closes.

As fully diffing this up would inevitably send me over the diff limit, I invite ArbCom to review the method used, and/or just trust me I haven't misinterpreted anything. If I can offer this evidence any other way compliant with evidence guidelines, I'm open to suggestions.

Communication style
Andy often communicates in terse messages, containing very little explaining of reasoning. Discussions that ensue often have the appearance of a game of 20 questions.

Sometimes the discussion ends with mutual understanding (diff(s))

Sometimes the discussion ends in misunderstanding (diff)

Sometimes these messages are interpreted as hostility (diffs)

Sometimes these messages are interpreted as incompetence (diffs)

Edit warring
Andy sometimes resorts to edit warring in lieu of discussion. (diffs)

Civilty and baiting
Andy has been the target of many personal attacks. In (almost?) all of those cases Andy hasn't been provoked into misbehaving.


 * It's impossible to support a statement like this with quantitative analyses in this evidence section while still keeping to the diff limit. I don't know how to prove this while keeping to the limits. Diffs are listed as examples only.

Recommendations
I've made some recomendations. It could be seen as my own workshop. Hookers and blackjack are not currently included there and are strictly optional.