User:MartinHabib1/Dissociation rate/Amy maurad25 Peer Review

General info
MartinHabib1
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:MartinHabib1/Dissociation rate
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Dissociation rate

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead already includes an introductory statement to introduce the main topic at hand. All of the included information added is backed up correctly by an adequate use of sourcing. The content added is given in a neutral tone and adds a specific form of detail than the information that was originally published. Overall, the work added contributed beneficially to the generic information provided and proceeds in a step forward of analysis to Dissociation rate. The only suggestion would be to include references in your Sandbox Draft to ensure that citing is done correctly before its addition to the main article.