User:Martinezwhite/Moxviquil/Digit2334 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

Given the article seems to only have the lead section currently written, I will be mostly be critiquing that part.

The lead section is clear and concise. It gives a gives a nice introduction to the article and what it will be detailing. Once the draft of the article is more fleshed out, the lead section would be improved with a bit more elaboration on the history of Moxviquil and its larger importance on history and archaeology.

I would also recommend creating distinct sections for the article like "Early History," "Downfall," or whatever headings are relevant to your research to create a more distinct organization.

Since the content is little, I cannot comment on the balance of perspectives, but current voice is neutral and does not force a narrative upon the leader.

The first two sources seem to be reliable sources, peer-reviewed journal articles, and the last two sources seem to be tourist guides or informational pamphlets about the site. Overall, the sources are well-chosen.

My main critique is the article just needs to be fleshed out with more information and sources before I can give a more substantive critique, but it looks like you are on the right track.

Sidenote:

I know school and the current environment is overwhelming, so thank you for doing your best in the current moment. I just wanted to let you now this critique is coming from a place of grace and understanding. I hope you have a great week!