User:Marvin Sherlock/Meituan

Works Cited

Lan, Xiaochong, et al. NEON: Living Needs Prediction System in Meituan. 2023. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1145/3580305.3599874.

Works Cited

Wang, Chuanpeng. “Customer Satisfaction Evaluation of Food Delivery Platforms-Taking Meituan as an Example.” 2020 International Conference on Big Data Economy and Information Management (BDEIM), Big Data Economy and Information Management (BDEIM), 2020 International Conference on, BDEIM, Dec. 2020, pp. 124–27. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1109/BDEIM52318.2020.00037.

Article
Cash flow operation controversy[edit]

On November 19, 2018, in response to a report by Wang Hai, a professional counterfeiter, he discovered after testing and tracing that Meituan's gold flow operation process was suspected of circumventing financial regulations and was suspected of arbitraging the right to turn over funds within a seven-day time gap, creating unfair competition for other market operators. This is the third time that Meituan's gold flow process has been publicly reported as problematic. Wang Hai microblogging real-name report letter shows that he ordered two Meituan takeout meals on September 19, 2018, and after consulting the China Merchants Bank found that the payee was "(Special) Meituan Dianping", which did not show the full name and the bank couldn't find out the full name itself was weird. And logged into the public Dianping net using WeChat, Apple Pay, and the United States to pay for the purchase of three dinners, the bank records show that the payee for the "Meituan Dianping", and then intentionally refunds, queried WeChat billing found that the payee merchant full name of the "Beijing three fast online science and technology Co. Ltd." Wang Hai believes that the nature of the money paid by the guests for the customer's reserve needs to be held by the "payment business license" of the third-party payment institutions to collect and pay on behalf of the customer. Meituan's "Qianbubao" company, which has a payment license, is available but intentionally not used, and is suspected of operating illegally with the intent of evading government financial regulation to divert funds or earn a profit margin. He found that the United States group merchants to join the rules every seven days merchants could only self-pickup settlement. This seven days is equal to all the money that exists in an unspecified place without license and regulation, 2017 company turnover has exceeded 360 billion, an average daily turnover of about 1 billion yuan, even if there is only a seven-day account period means that it may be misappropriated in and out of the investment or used to eat the spread of the funds as much as nearly 7 billion, which is a huge hidden interests, while other counterparts and even different industries of the general company but not have this benefit, creating an unfair competitive advantage for the offender. He believes that the report violated the "non-financial institutions payment service management approach" Article 47 any non-financial institutions and individuals without the approval of the People's Bank of China engaged in or disguised in the payment business, the People's Bank of China and its branches to order the termination of the payment business; suspected of committing a crime, according to the law, the public security organs transferred to the investigation; constitutes a crime, shall be investigated for criminal responsibility. Wang Hai also has to report rewards to him according to the "Payment Settlement Illegal and Illegal Behavior Reporting and Rewarding Measures". November 21, Meituan made an official response to Wang Hai's report, said previously with the relevant departments by the requirements of the development of the compliance improvement program, and according to the plan to continue to promote the implementation of the program. Meituan has been by the requirements of the relevant departments to cooperate with the clearing organization, according to the plan to promote the implementation of the rectification program, but the semantics are vague, and the outside world does not yet know more details.

On January 2, 2021, some netizens found that the "Features" section of the entry for the Memorial Hall for the Victims of the Nanjing Massacre of the Invading Japanese Army in the Meituan Tickets was labeled as "a good place for relaxation and leisure", which triggered the attention and criticism of many netizens. In addition, in the introduction of many other important historical sites and memorial halls, the American Tuan Tickets can also be found such as "indoor fun", "no meat, no fun" and other labels. In the afternoon of the same day, Meituan Tickets publicly apologized for the incident.

On April 26, 2021, the State Administration for Market Supervision (SAMS), based on a report, filed a case to investigate the suspected monopoly behavior of Meituan, including "two choices", in accordance with the law. The company then responded that it would actively cooperate with the regulatory authorities in the investigation. On October 8, 2021, the ACMS required Meituan to hand over a fine of 3.442 billion yuan, and Meituan was also required to submit a self-inspection compliance report to the ACMS for three consecutive years