User:Maryannelindemann/Ethics of torture/GERSH.D Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Maryannelindemann


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Maryannelindemann/Ethics_of_torture?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ethics of torture

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The Lead does not seem changed and does not provide an overview of the article. The content of the article is fairly up to date however the overall topic is pretty old so some of the articles used are a little dated. The content provided allows for the reader to get a deeper understanding of the topic at hand. The wording in my opinion could use some adjustment to make it an easier read, but the overall concept is able to be understood. This is all for the information added within the premise. The History portion however doesn't seem like it fits within the portion of the article extracted into the sandbox. It highlights how a country had legal torture while the history speaks upon illegal use of torture within European states. The additional content for the opposition accentuates the article well.

Most of the content does provide more insight on the mindset of the individual ideas established within the article. In my opinion the content used will be beneficial to the article in explaining ethic of torture. Especially the information included in the premise and opposition section.

The content was relevant to the topic.