User:MarylynnTrinh/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Joe Pavelski
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I chose this article because my favorite sport is hockey and I love the San Jose Sharks. Joe Pavelski used to be the captain.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? No
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Yes, there are sentences in the article that sound like they are written by a Sharks and Pavelski fan. Many sentences are praising Pavelski for his achievements.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Overrepresentation of bias for San Jose Sharks
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Articles seems to emphasize and praise Pavelski's achievements

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Only conversations about modifying external links
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Rated C-Class, low importance. Yes, multiple WikiProjects
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Average
 * What are the article's strengths? Very thorough, up to date, and easy to follow
 * How can the article be improved? Needs to be more neutral. I can tell a Pavelski fan wrote a lot of it. Described Pavelski as having "solid" and "strong" seasons and having "hot streaks".
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? well-developed

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: