User:Marymountain/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Feminist philosophy of science

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I enjoy reading about science and views from women. This article matters because it discusses science in relation to gender roles and gender identity in society. This article also discusses feminist scientists conducting research. My preliminary impression of the article was that it was very factual and well written, and got the main idea across to me as the reader.

Evaluate the article
When evaluating the article that I chose titled "Feminist philosophy of science", I think that the article was very well written. I was not at all distracted when reading, and I learned a great deal about how gender roles and how gender bias can affect science and research that is conducted. The information included is not out of date, it does include previous information but this information is used to build upon and is important in understanding the history of feminist philosophy of science. The article is very neutral in tone which allows the reader to form his or her own opinion on the topic. Throughout the piece there are not any sections that are overrepresented or underrepresented, all sections have equal quality and quantity to portray the message that is trying to be put out. After clicking on a few of the citations to double check that they are accurate and work, the links led me to pages where I could conduct further reading if necessary. The many citations that are included at the end of the article come from a diverse array of authors and publications, which really backs up the authenticity of the article that I chose to read. This article was a part of a couple WikiEducation projects one in 2019 and one in 2022. This article is also rated high-importance in the feminism section, mid-importance in philosophy, and mid-importance in science.