User:Marysarkis/1933 Long Beach earthquake/2003la Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Marysarkis/1933 Long Beach earthquake


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Marysarkis/1933_Long_Beach_earthquake?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 1933 Long Beach earthquake

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article evaluation is looking pretty good, I liked how they evaluated each section of the article, giving details about what’s good and what could be improved. The draft itself does not have a lot of information. Only has a section for the causes of the earthquake, but instead could have section such as eyewitness and the history of the earthquake/environment. A useful resources that they can use to improve their contribution draft could be https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/ci3359741/impact. One thing that I would add to the article evaluation would be having more description for the photos in the article. They are pretty short (a few words only), but I feel like it would have the reader engaged and more interested in what’s happening in the photo with a more detailed description. The article is pretty short, and does not give out a lot of information, so this gives you an advantage of having more to write about for the article contribution. There is a section called references, but there are not references listed. Would be good to have at least 3-4 different references for your article contribution to back up your information.

Response to Peer Review (Ricardo)
I agree that our article does not have that much information yet. However, we are all currently doing our own independent research and coming together as a group to narrow down our ideas and notes to make a more cohesive article in the end. I also like the idea of adding a section that includes the eyewitnesses and history of the event. This idea was also suggested by another peer review and we have all talked about it as a group as well, so we'll make sure to add this in the article. We will also continue to work on the references section.