User:Marysarkis/1933 Long Beach earthquake/Emilyhg.371 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Marysarkis/1933 Long Beach earthquake


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 1933 Long Beach earthquake

Evaluate the drafted changes
Not much has been written in the draft but I am not sure if there has been stuff already added to the article. The article itself looks well built but there are still sections that could be added if you have not already. First hand accounts could be a good section to add or insert into a section already there. I really like the photos used within the article. Another thing I would add in the causes is more about the geological setting and the types of faults that caused the earthquake to occur. The lead section is very short but detailed and explains the right amount of information for being the first thing people read. So far the actual article looks really good but I do not know what was added by students and what was already there before.

Response to Peer Review
The sections are in the process of being updated, and more will be added to the article. There will be a more in depth analysis in the finish product, as the peer review states the need for more content. Our group is adding more details about each category/section in order to include a solid amount of information. The additions will be made visible, and more subject is to be added. The peer review states improvements that will benefit the final project and analysis.