User:Marysarkis/1933 Long Beach earthquake/John.heuver Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Not much to evaluate here, but what is included seems good. It provides relevant information to the faults which caused the earthquake. the main issue is there are no sources included, which means there is no reputable source for the information.

Response to Peer Review (Ricardo)
Yes, as we continue to conduct our research we will continue to add on to our references section. We will also continue to narrow down our ideas and provide more relevant information regarding our article in order to have a more cohesive and successful article.