User:Marythemuffinlady/Aquatic biomonitoring/Goobglorp Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Marythemuffinlady


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Marythemuffinlady/Aquatic biomonitoring


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Aquatic biomonitoring

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Lead
 * This is an addition to the article (a section)
 * The lead of this section is great
 * Concise, informative, lets the reader know what the section is focusing on
 * Content
 * All of the content that was added is entirely related to the topic
 * Most of the information is related to the multitude of ways that algae are impacted by, or able to impact, their aquatic environment
 * This is important as this demonstrates the ability of these organisms to be good bioindicators
 * If not relating to the helpfulness of algae as bioindicators, the additional information referred to algae overall which is also great
 * Tone and Balance
 * Neutral tone, very informative
 * Sources and references
 * Many references that are used often and sometimes more than once
 * This is great as it shows that the information displayed has literature to back it up
 * However, I am unable to look at these references easily as their links are not included in the bibliography
 * Using the Cite tool when editing and pasting the URL or DOI for these papers can fix this
 * It may also be helpful to link other Wikipedia articles to various terminology and organisms mentioned in the article
 * Such as for “algae”, “chlorophyll a”, “diatoms”, etc.
 * Organization
 * The body of the article was put together very well, and the end tied it all very nicely
 * The only concern is the slight repetition of “This” at the beginning of a few sentences
 * It may help to tie these sentences together instead
 * It may also help to use another type of statement, utilizing words such as: “demonstrating”, “establishing”, “furthermore”, “substantiating”, “suggesting”, “evidence showing”, etc.
 * Images and Media
 * This article could benefit with a photo or two depicting the algae that are mentioned – just to give it some “pretty fluff” 😊
 * Overall
 * The article has been written clearly as a whole and is incredibly informative. It also wrapped up at the end very well
 * Marythemuffinlady has clearly done extensive research on the subject of algae as a tool for aquatic biomonitoring and it is absolutely noticeable in their writing
 * The only things that I believe could use some modification are of the grammatical tweaks (listed above), perhaps an image, Wikipedia article links to terms, and proper links to the references being used
 * Great draft and great job!

Goobglorp (talk) 01:12, 30 March 2021 (UTC)