User:Mas1799/sandbox

sandbox example

Article evaluation
article for evaluation : Internet of things

1 Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Almost all parts of the article were relevant. Some descriptions were very broad and transferred that part in a deeper dive, which can be probably separated as an individual article (Manufacturing). I was distracted to lookup some terms, as authors were using very technologically advanced language. 2 Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? There were many examples, based on someone's views and assumptions. 3 Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Citations i checked were totally fine and the source was reliable, but there could be some issues with plagiarism. 4 Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? There were different reference sources. Some of them were from the scientific journals, but some part of them were from news or IT and business reviews. 5 Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? There were some outdated facts, if 2014 can count as old. Most of the facts are updated or were updated recently. 6 Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There are a lot of conversations about the structure of the article. Someone is pointing out assumptions of how to write Internet of Things, as we discussed lower case or uppercase I and T. Mas1799 (talk) 04:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)