User:MashedLemons3/Daphne cneorum/HydrangeaLove Peer Review

General info
I am reviewing MashedLemons3's work.
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MashedLemons3/Daphne_cneorum?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Daphne cneorum

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The end of the lead is worded a bit poorly, so I would recommend that you try to reword the last sentence of the lead into something that is less choppy. Otherwise the lead provides a good introduction to the article that encompasses the main ideas you have laid out in your draft.

The content you plan to add is relevant to the topic and will greatly bolster the article. There is no obvious content that does not belong, the only missing content is the new content you plan to input. The content you plan to add seems to be up to date and of great relevance to your topic.

The tone is neutral, but sections of the article read as very casual/choppy. This is noticeable in the last sentence of the lead and the middle to end of the section on diseases. I would recommend rewording these areas for clarity and a more cohesive sounding paragraph. There is good balance in the information (including that which you plan to add) and no noticeable skewing of viewpoint or opinion.

The citations seem to be properly formatted and all have working links. The sources are reliable sounding as well. Make sure you add enough new sources (3-5) to get the best grade possible.

The overall organizational plan of the article is good. Possibly consider starting with your description of plant/plant growth section before the habitat section for a smoother transition. I think that the disease section being at the end of the article makes sense.

Consider adding a new image. The images present are good, but very similar, so you could try to add some that show diversity. For the image embedded into your article, I recommend adding a figure description and clearly citing it to avoid copyright/plagiarism.

The content you plan to add to the article will greatly improve the article as a whole. The variety in the type of information that you plan to add is a strength of your contributions. The content could be improved by paying close attention to wording and phrasing to ensure that the article comes across as clear and credible. You're on the right track! You got this!