User:Masonbissada/sandbox2

My Model Article
Saga (comics)

Article Evaluation - Monstress
I believe everything that is in the article (summary, themes, reception, collected editions, references, external links) is relevant to the topic. Nothing particularly distracted me.

One thing that immediately jumped out of me that is out of date is the number of issues. It says 18, but they are currently on issue 20.

One thing that I think should be added is a list of characters from the comic with brief descriptions of them. This is a particularly dense comic, and there are many characters with backstories that are important to the plot.

The article seems to be neutral and unbiased. It just doesn't contain a ton of information.

I think some actual quotes from the writer and artist, rather than just some paraphrasing, would go a long way. I also think it has received more praise and has left more of an impact than the article implies.

The links work and back up the claims made in the article. There is actually a lot of useful information to glean from the links that isn't in the article itself.

A lot of the information comes from reputable news publications and official press releases. Some of the articles that are profiles on the writer or artist could be seen as biased, but not to the point of compromising the factual information.

There are no conversations going on in the talk page. Just a list of potentially useful links for the article.