User:MastCell/Evidence/Slow edit-warring


 * March 18, inserts standalone section quoting a 1989 Washington Post article; I remove it on March 20 and explain further on the article talk page
 * March 22: Strider12 responds on the talk page by accusing me of disruption and "just another attempt to hide the FACT that even many (perhaps most) pro-choice experts don't agree with efforts to dismiss the real psychological significance of abortion." . I respond . Strider12 considers this sufficient to reinsert the edit.
 * March 23: I repeat my concerns on the talk page . Strider12 does not respond.
 * March 24: I remove the edit as it remains disputed and my concerns have not been addressed.
 * March 28: Strider12 reinserts the edit again, without intervening discussion, accusing me of "deleting her edit without consensus" . I remove it, as I consider the edit problematic and there has been no serious attempt to address my concerns on the talk page. Strider12 reverts, writing "do not DELETE material without showing consensus" . I break my self-imposed 1RR on the article and revert again, quoting WP:V . Strider12 again reinserts the edit . At this point, talkpage discussion begins again, with several editors noting that Strider12 is incorrectly applying WP:V and is repeatedly inserting controversial text without discussion.