User:Matchabae/Religion and alcohol/Ssatwik Peer Review

General info
Matchabae
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Matchabae/Religion and alcohol
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Religion and alcohol

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Make sure that all information is properly cited and referenced according to Wikipedia's guidelines. Use reliable and reputable sources, including academic journals and books.
 * include summaries of other relevant research studies and case studies that shed light on the topic. Provide a balanced perspective by showcasing different research findings and interpretation
 * Utilize relevant images, charts, graphs, and multimedia content to enhance the article's visual appeal and provide data representation.
 * Expand the discussion beyond the United States to include examples and insights from different regions and religious traditions around the world. Highlight how cultural and regional variations influence this relationship.

new

Lead[edit]
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? no
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? yes, it's concise

Content[edit][edit]
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? yes Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? yes

Ensure consistency in terminology and concepts throughout the text. For example, use "alcohol and religion" consistently instead of "alcohol and spirituality" or other variations to maintain clarity.

While providing detailed information is important, strive for concise and direct writing. Eliminate redundant phrases or ideas to make the text more concise and reader-friendly.

Tone and Balance[edit][edit]
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Sources and References[edit][edit]
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.) yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
 * Are the sources current? yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors?yes Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? yes
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) no
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes

'' Praise: The draft uses excellent sources which are of high quality, credible, and reliable. the draft is extremely well organized in terms of content. the images provided are really nice for providing a visual idea of what alcohol is to religion. ''

Organization[edit][edit]
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? no
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes

Images and Media[edit][edit]
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? yes
 * Are images well-captioned? yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? yes

For New Articles Only[edit][edit]
If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? yes
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? yes
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? yes
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? yes

Overall impressions[edit][edit]
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved? no need to.